Oceania Horizon

Inspection portal

Enter your passcode. Inspection records stay on this device.

{{ bioName }}, or use the passcode below

Passcode not recognised.

Oceania Horizon Pty Ltd

{{ inspectorName }}

Start an inspection

First-party inspection by your own people, carrying your own outcome. Recorded on the device, reported the same day.

Live traffic, Australian coast
Full map
Turn on Face ID for this device and you will not need the passcode again.
Face ID enabled for {{ bioName }}
{{ statusLine }}
{{ storageNote }}

On this device

No inspections saved yet.

{{ row.vesselName }} {{ row.typeLabel }}
{{ row.meta }}
Not yet exported. Generate the report before leaving this device idle.
Pilbara Ports marine safety bulletin

PH 02/26: Port Hedland vessel inspection criteria

Effective 1 May 2026. Machinery physical inspections are carried out at anchorage only, or up to 30 days prior to arrival at the load or discharge port. The Port Hedland Vessel Vetting Form remains a Pilbara Ports controlled document completed by the vessel; this inspection does not replace it.

Section 6.1: Trigger criteria

One or more trigger makes a machinery physical inspection mandatory. The Harbour Master may also direct an inspection under Trigger E.

{{ t.letter }}
{{ t.title }}
{{ t.detail }}

Section 6.3: Mandatory machinery inspection scope

Where a trigger applies, the scope below is mandatory.

{{ g.title }}
  • {{ it }}
Reference, not part of the client report

Excellence hints

What to look for when something goes beyond the standard. Use each framework's own language in the "Where this inspection exceeds standard practice" note, it reads as evidence, not a compliment.

DryBMS

Dry Bulk Centre of Excellence's Dry Bulk Management Standard. Rates management practice across four pillars, each on a four level maturity scale.

The four pillars
  • Plant, condition and reliability of the ship, its structure, machinery and equipment
  • People, competence, familiarity, manning, welfare and the conditions the crew work under
  • Process, the management system, procedures, certification and how they are actually applied
  • Performance, inspection and detention record, and the trend the operator is on
The maturity scale
  • Basic, meets existing legal requirements, nothing more
  • Intermediate, has identified processes that go beyond compliance
  • Advanced, those improved practices are further developed and applied consistently
  • Excellence, the highest tier, self correcting and no longer dependent on individual effort to hold
What Excellence looks like, in DryBMS's own words
"Beyond compliance", not just meeting the regulation, identifiably exceeding it.
"Safer, more sustainable operational practices", the practice holds up over time, not just on the day of inspection.
"Demonstrate operational excellence", evidence the company can show, not just a self-assessment.

Ready to adapt: Planned maintenance close out is fully evidenced with photographs and dated records without prompting, consistent with DryBMS Excellence level maturity for the Plant pillar.

RightShip RISQ

RightShip's Inspection Ship Questionnaire, used for bulk carriers and general cargo and container ships. No numbered maturity scale, every item sorts into one of three tiers instead.

The three tiers
  • Statutory, the regulatory minimum, required under IMO, flag and class rules
  • Recommended, industry guidance drawn from IMO, ISO, ILO, OCIMF and ICS standards
  • Desirable, best practice benchmarks drawn from maritime publications and P and I loss prevention guidance, the tier that separates an average vessel from a standout one
What excellence looks like, in RISQ's own words
Full conformance across statutory, recommended and desirable items, not statutory alone.
"Commitment to crew welfare and safe and sustainable operation", demonstrated, not asserted.
Aligned with "industry recommendations and best practice", the standard RightShip itself points to.

Ready to adapt: Mooring line management goes beyond the statutory and recommended requirements and meets the RISQ desirable-item benchmark for best practice documentation.

SIRE 2.0

OCIMF's Ship Inspection Report Programme, second generation. Built for tankers, but the language transfers well, it is the clearest of the three about what exceeding expectations means.

The three elements and the scale
  • Hardware, the physical condition of the equipment
  • Process, whether company procedure was actually followed
  • Human factors, how the crew executed the task, including the Performance Influencing Factors bearing on them at the time
  • Graded response, from "not as expected" up to "exceeds expectations", OCIMF's own top rating
What excellence looks like, in SIRE 2.0's own words
"Exceeds expectations", the literal top grade on OCIMF's own scale, not a paraphrase.
A positive human factors observation, recorded when a crew member's performance "exceeded normal expectations", shown green in the report.
Hardware, process and human elements all reflecting sound management together, not just one of the three.

Ready to adapt: The bosun's handling of the mooring operation exceeded normal expectations under pressure, consistent with a positive SIRE 2.0 human factors observation.

Capture
{{ areaNow }}

Shoot as you walk. Captures taken in the same area within three minutes group as one issue, so five shots of one defect stay together and you pick the clearest afterwards. Dictate the note with the microphone on your keyboard.

Nothing captured yet.
{{ s.areaLabel }} {{ s.when }} · {{ s.count }} {{ s.filedLabel }}
{{ m.thumb }}
Likely findings
{{ curTitle }}
{{ curStatus }}
{{ t.n }}code {{ t.code }}
Vessel and inspection details
PH 02/26 section 6.1, trigger assessment

One or more yes makes the machinery physical inspection mandatory.

{{ t.letter }}
{{ t.title }}
{{ t.detail }}
{{ triggerVerdict }}
{{ g.count }}
{{ it.text }}
Logged {{ it.logged }}
{{ ph.thumb }}
Overall assessment and declaration
{{ repeatCount }} from a previous inspection of this ship
  • {{ r.text }}

A repeat finding is evidence the corrective action did not hold. It is read as a system issue, not a defect, and it carries weight in both the report and any vetting review.

DryBMS maturity

Scored against the four DryBMS pillars so the operator reads the result in a framework they already use. A suggested level is offered from what was found; override it where your judgement differs.

{{ p.title }} {{ p.blurb }} {{ p.suggestion }}
Effectiveness of the safety management system

A.1206(34) turns on effectiveness, not on whether a procedure exists. Operational control is a check on the effectiveness of communication, interaction and familiarity of the crew, and clear grounds arise where the system is found not to be effectively implemented.

Areas marked not inspected are left out of the report entirely, so the document only shows what was actually examined. The report opens in Word for editing before it goes out. Photographs are resized as the report is built so the finished document stays under the 10 MB most mail servers accept. Building it needs no signal, the share sheet offers Mail, Signal, AirDrop and Files, and if you are offline it saves to the device for sending later.

{{ toast }}